Not Again! Public Perception, Regulation, and Nanotechnology
Regulation and Governance, 2009
20 Pages Posted: 3 Dec 2008 Last revised: 15 Sep 2009
Date Written: December 1, 2008
Abstract
Forthcoming in Regulation and Governance (2009). Although it is often argued that government oversight is needed to assure public opinion does not mistakenly view nanotechnology as dangerous or to restore public trust in government agencies, a question that we ask in this article, and one that implicates many of the themes raised in the other papers in this symposium, is whether governments can truly play this role. In short, as the world lurches toward regulation of NT we should ask: Why the rush? Can anticipatory regulation, perceived as the government doing something, fulfill the competing hopes to "restore trust," "pave-the-way," "increase awareness," or "satisfy democratic notions of accountability"? Or, is regulation more likely to increase existing divisions about nanotechnology's future?
Keywords: Nanotechnology, Regulation, Technology, Genetics, Genetically modified, Governance, Risk, Cognitive, Psychology, Culture, Public Engagement
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
A New Approach to Risk Management for Nanotechnology
By Kenneth W. Abbott, Gary E. Marchant, ...
-
Risk Management Principles for Nanotechnology
By Douglas J. Sylvester, Kenneth W. Abbott, ...
-
Technology Wars: Mending the Failure of Democratic Discourse
-
Size Matters: Regulating Nanotechnology
By Albert Lin
-
Limiting the Precautionary Principle: Weapons Regulation in the Face of Scientific Uncertainty
-
By Douglas J. Sylvester and Sharon Lohr
-
Keeping Pace with Nanotechnology: A Proposal for a New Approach to Environmental Accountability
-
A Framework Convention for Nanotechnology? Policy Review
By Kenneth W. Abbott, Gary E. Marchant, ...