FASB and IASB: Dependence Despite Independence
35 Pages Posted: 10 Dec 2008 Last revised: 1 Jun 2015
Abstract
Most regulatory bodies are either powerful or independent. The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) and the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) are both — at least in theory. This paper argues that in practice, the two boards are less powerful and less independent than many critics claim. Both the FASB and the IASB face outside pressure, especially from politics, and both have made concessions to please their constituencies. Plato's famous philosopher kings illustrate why: without rulemaking powers, accounting experts will never be as independent as if they were legislators.
Note: This article is based on a briefing paper prepared for the EU-US Financial Services Roundtable (2005) and on a presentation held at the Future of IASB-Funding Conference (2006).
Keywords: FASB, IASB, IAS, IFRS, accounting, internationalization, legal harmonization, standardization
JEL Classification: F50, G15, G18, G38, K22, M41, M48
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
International Accounting Standards and Accounting Quality
By Mary E. Barth, Wayne R. Landsman, ...
-
Mandatory IFRS Reporting Around the World: Early Evidence on the Economic Consequences
By Holger Daske, Luzi Hail, ...
-
International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS): Pros and Cons for Investors
By Ray Ball
-
Financial Statement Effects of Adopting International Accounting Standards: the Case of Germany
By Mingyi Hung and K.r. Subramanyam
-
Market Reaction to the Adoption of IFRS in Europe
By Chris Armstrong, Mary E. Barth, ...
-
Market Reaction to the Adoption of IFRS in Europe
By Chris Armstrong, Mary E. Barth, ...
-
By Vicentiu Covrig, Mark L. Defond, ...
-
Adopting a Label: Heterogeneity in the Economic Consequences Around IAS/IFRS Adoptions
By Holger Daske, Luzi Hail, ...