The United States-Peru Trade Promotion Agreement the Foreigner Investment Protection in the Treaty (Spanish Version)

Revista de Economia y Derecho (UPC), Vol. 20, 2008

32 Pages Posted: 8 Dec 2008 Last revised: 13 Dec 2008

Date Written: October 5, 2008

Abstract

On May 3, 2006, the Minister of Commerce of Peru published a letter on the official website stating that the Chapter X of the Trade Promotion Agreement (investment provisions) neither incorporates new legal mechanisms, nor undermines national sovereignty . The letter intended to refute information spread by the Peruvian media inferring that the agreement with the U.S. would allow American corporations to obtain huge compensations from the Peruvian government, without intervention of the Peruvian judicial system, if they feel that the Peruvian system do not favor them. The Minister argued that Article 63 of the Peruvian Constitution allows the parties to solve the controversies in international arbitral tribunals whenever they agree. Therefore, since the possibility of solving disputes in international forums has always existed, this provision of the agreement cannot be considered as an innovation. What the Ministry did not say is that the Trade Promotion Agreement (TPA) will allow the American investors (not only corporations but also investors) to avoid the national forum and sue the government in an international forum if the government does not comply with the minimum standard of treatment required. Under a similar provision in the North America Free Trade Agreement, Methanex (a Canadian company) sued the U.S. for $90 million, and on April 30, 2004, Mexico was compelled to compensate Metalclad (an American corporation) for $16.8 millions for a tantamount expropriation. Is the provision of the Treaty, which allows the foreigner investors to avoid national jurisdiction if any controversy with the nation arises, constitutional? Supposing that the agreement do not overlook Peruvian constitutional law or undermine their national sovereignty, is the mechanism of dispute resolutions between the investors and the government new for Peru? Finally, is Peru (a country that lacks of a well developed administrative system) really prepared to maintain a standard of treatment to American investors not below the standard established in the agreement?

Note: Downloadable document is in Spanish.

Suggested Citation

Espinoza, Jean Pierre, The United States-Peru Trade Promotion Agreement the Foreigner Investment Protection in the Treaty (Spanish Version) (October 5, 2008). Revista de Economia y Derecho (UPC), Vol. 20, 2008, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1312113

Jean Pierre Espinoza (Contact Author)

Espinoza Law Offices P.A. ( email )

1506 S. Florida Ave.
Lakeland, FL 33803
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
93
Abstract Views
747
rank
334,293
PlumX Metrics