Identifying an Australian 'Shadow' Benefit/Cost Ratio for Public Projects
10 Pages Posted: 11 Dec 2008 Last revised: 15 Feb 2009
Date Written: February 11, 2009
Abstract
This paper examines the social opportunity cost of a hypothetical public project in Australia and compares these values with the cost of the project as measured by factor prices. Since 2001, the Australian taxation system has included an ad valorem tax, the Goods and Services Tax, however relatively little analysis of the impact of this tax on public project evaluation methods has been undertaken. This tax creates divergences between social opportunity cost and conventional cost measures. Therefore it is recommended that shadow prices be applied to pubic projects. Following Campbell (1975), a shadow price can be introduced into Australian project evaluation in the form of a cut-off benefit cost ratio. The calculations reported on in the paper indicate that this ratio lies between 1 and 1.3 for public projects in Australia.
Keywords: allocative efficiency, cost benefit analysis, efficiency, optimal taxation, project evaluation, social discount rate
JEL Classification: D61, H21, H43
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Global Warming: Discounting is Not the Issue, But Substitutability Is
-
Preserving Natural Capital in a World of Uncertainty and Scarce Financial Resources
-
On the Relation Between Discounting of Climate Change and Edgeworth-Pareto Substitutability
By Tomas Kögel
-
On the Relation between Discounting of Climate Change and Edgeworth-Pareto Substitutability
By Tomas Kögel
-
A New Look into the Determinants of the Ecological Discount Rate: Disentangling Social Preferences
By Luciana Echazu, Diego Nocetti, ...
-
By Simon Dietz and Alec Morton
-
On the Relation between Dual-Rate Discounting and Substitutability
By Tomas Kögel