Why the Brownlow Committee Failed: Neutrality and Partisanship in the Early Years of Public Administration

Administration and Society, 28.1 (May 1996), pp. 3-38.

55 Pages Posted: 21 Dec 2008  

Alasdair S. Roberts

University of Missouri at Columbia - Truman School of Public Affairs

Date Written: July 19, 1994

Abstract

In 1938, Congress rejected a package of administrative reforms that had been developed by a committee of academics headed by Louis Brownlow. The defeat was the worst that President Roosevelt would suffer in three terms as President. This article suggests that the Brownlow Committee contributed to the debacle in Congress by ignoring evidence that its recommendations would prove contentious. It is argued that the committee members were caught in a dilemma: On the one hand, they wanted to obtain immediate reforms for a president to whom they felt a personal loyalty; on the other, they needed to maintain a demonstration of neutrality, which made it difficult to undertake the tasks of political management that were essential to craft a viable reform program. The demonstration of neutrality was a combination of arguments and routines that the academic community had invented to allay public skepticism about its members' trustworthiness as advisers on contentious issues.

Keywords: public administration, Roosevelt, reorganization, expertise, rhetoric, New Deal

Suggested Citation

Roberts, Alasdair S., Why the Brownlow Committee Failed: Neutrality and Partisanship in the Early Years of Public Administration (July 19, 1994). Administration and Society, 28.1 (May 1996), pp. 3-38.. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1318398

Alasdair S. Roberts (Contact Author)

University of Missouri at Columbia - Truman School of Public Affairs ( email )

101 Middlebush Hall
Columbia, MO 65201
United States

HOME PAGE: http://www.aroberts.us

Paper statistics

Downloads
146
Rank
163,905
Abstract Views
1,256