Sky Reefer Cases - Analysis of Case Law Developments and its Effects on Hague Visby or Hamburg Rules Jurisdiction, 2003-To the Present: A Comparison of South African Cases

24 Pages Posted: 21 Dec 2008

Date Written: December 21, 2008

Abstract

This work discusses the question whether in a foreign arbitration clause in a maritime bill of lading, governed by the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act (COGSA), is invalid under the statute, or whether such a clause is enforceable under the (United States') Federal Arbitration Act. The legal positions in the United States and South Africa are compared in this work.

Keywords: Sky Reefer Cases - Analysis of Case Law Developments and Its Effects on Hague Visby or Hamburg Rules Jurisdiction, 2003-to the present, A Comparison of South African Cases

Suggested Citation

Cwinya-ai, Robert Ongom, Sky Reefer Cases - Analysis of Case Law Developments and its Effects on Hague Visby or Hamburg Rules Jurisdiction, 2003-To the Present: A Comparison of South African Cases (December 21, 2008). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1318884 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1318884

Robert Ongom Cwinya-ai (Contact Author)

Port of New Orleans Legal Office ( email )

Port of New Orleans Place
New Orleans, LA 70118
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
173
Abstract Views
968
rank
172,032
PlumX Metrics