Filtering Applications, Number of Judgments Delivered and Judicial Discourse by Supreme Courts: Some Thoughts Based on the French Example

THE LEGITIMACY OF HIGHEST COURTS' RULINGS. JUDICIAL DELIBERATIONS AND BEYOND, N. Huls, M. Adams, J. Bomhoff, eds., T.M.C. Asser Press, 2009

19 Pages Posted: 24 Dec 2008

Date Written: October 2007

Abstract

Is it possible to compare the judicial discourse of different Supreme Courts without taking into account the typology of cases on which they have to decide? One of the main functional differences between Supreme Courts is in the amount of cases that can be brought to these Courts and determined by them. This is the issue that will be discussed in this article, where the author stresses the importance and the consequences of this element in terms of legitimacy.

Keywords: Judicial Deliberation, Mitchel Lasser, French Cour de cassation

Suggested Citation

Pinna, Andrea, Filtering Applications, Number of Judgments Delivered and Judicial Discourse by Supreme Courts: Some Thoughts Based on the French Example (October 2007). THE LEGITIMACY OF HIGHEST COURTS' RULINGS. JUDICIAL DELIBERATIONS AND BEYOND, N. Huls, M. Adams, J. Bomhoff, eds., T.M.C. Asser Press, 2009, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1319281

Andrea Pinna (Contact Author)

Foley Hoag AARPI ( email )

153, rue du Faudourg Saint-Honoré
Paris, 75008
France

HOME PAGE: http://foleyhoag.com/people/pinna-andrea

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
69
Abstract Views
539
rank
371,975
PlumX Metrics