'True Threats' and the Issue of Intent

53 Pages Posted: 4 Jan 2009

See all articles by Paul T. Crane

Paul T. Crane

University of Richmond School of Law

Date Written: October 1, 2006

Abstract

What mens rea, if any, is required for threatening speech to be constitutionally criminalized? Must the speaker have intended for his communication to be threatening? In Virginia v. Black (2003), the Supreme Court for the first time provided a definition of "true threats," a categorical exception to the First Amendment. However, the Court failed to clearly answer the above questions. As a result, lower courts have interpreted Black's language to reach contradictory results regarding the issue of intent. Consequently, speech that is constitutionally protected in one jurisdiction may be criminalized in another. Such controversy and confusion is not new to the jurisprudence. Since the Court's decision in Watts v. United States (1969), which created the "true threats" exception, lower courts have disagreed over the proper intent standard for threatening speech. Instead of clarifying the doctrine, the Court's decision in Black has only served to further muddy the jurisprudence. When Black was decided, the overwhelming majority of courts had settled on an objective intent standard; however, the Court's language in Black has cast some doubt on the propriety of that approach. This Note will examine the issue of intent and its disputed place in the true threats jurisprudence from the debate's inception to the present day. Moreover, the impact of Black will be elucidated and explored. Finally, this Note suggests that when the Court addresses the issue of intent again, it should adopt a standard that requires the government to prove that the speaker intended for his communication to be threatening.

Keywords: true threats, Virginia v. Black, First Amendment, free speech, Watts v. United States, mens rea, intent, Chaplinksy

Suggested Citation

Crane, Paul T., 'True Threats' and the Issue of Intent (October 1, 2006). Virginia Law Review, Vol. 92, pp. 1225-1277, 2006. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1322431

Paul T. Crane (Contact Author)

University of Richmond School of Law ( email )

28 Westhampton Way
Richmond, VA 23173
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
65
Abstract Views
407
rank
338,244
PlumX Metrics