Inequality and Redistribution: Evidence from U.S. Counties and States, 1890-1930
61 Pages Posted: 20 Jan 2009 Last revised: 31 Jan 2009
Date Written: January 12, 2009
Abstract
Does economic inequality affect redistributive policy? This paper turns to U.S. county data on land inequality over the period 1890-1930 to help address this fundamental question in political economy. Redistributive policy was primarily decided at the local level during this period, making county level data particularly informative. Examining within state variation also reduces the potential impact of latent institutional and political variables. The paper also uses a variety of identification strategies, including historic variables as well as county weather and crop characteristics as instruments for land inequality. The evidence consistently suggests that greater inequality is significantly associated with less redistribution. This negative relationship is especially large in heavily rural counties, where concentrated land ownership implied that landed elites also controlled the majority of economic production.
Keywords: Inequality, Redistribution
JEL Classification: O00, H00
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
The Long-Term Effects of Africa's Slave Trades
By Nathan Nunn
-
Ruggedness: The Blessing of Bad Geography in Africa
By Nathan Nunn and Diego Puga
-
Ruggedness: The Blessing of Bad Geography in Africa
By Nathan Nunn and Diego Puga
-
The Modern Impact of Precolonial Centralization in Africa
By Nicola Gennaioli and Ilia Rainer
-
The Importance of History for Economic Development
By Nathan Nunn
-
Economic and Political Inequality in Development: The Case of Cundinamarca, Colombia
By Daron Acemoglu, M B, ...
-
Economic and Political Inequality in Development: The Case of Cundinamarca, Colombia
By Daron Acemoglu, M B, ...
-
By Daron Acemoglu and Martin Kaae Jensen
-
The Persistent Effects of Peru's Mining Mita
By Melissa Dell