Comparative Advantage, Segmentation and Informal Earnings: A Marginal Treatment Effects Approach

64 Pages Posted: 19 Jan 2009

See all articles by Omar Arias

Omar Arias

World Bank

Melanie Khamis

IZA Institute of Labor Economics

Abstract

This paper employs recently developed econometric models of marginal treatment effects to analyze the relevance of labor market comparative advantage and segmentation in the participation and earnings performance of workers in formal and informal jobs in Argentina. A novel household data set on informality and self-employment and information on labor inspections targeting informal work was collected for this purpose. We account for endogeneity and selectivity issues in our estimations. Our results offer evidence for both comparative advantage and segmentation. No significant differences between the earnings of formal salaried workers and the self-employed are found, once accounted for positive selection bias into formal work. This is consistent with labor market comparative advantage considerations. On the contrary, informal salaried employment carries significant earnings penalties, alongside negative selection bias and modest positive sorting. These results are more consistent with segmentation.

Keywords: marginal treatment effects, occupational choice, segmentation, earnings, comparative advantage, informality, labor markets

JEL Classification: C31, J24, J31, J42, O17

Suggested Citation

Arias, Omar and Khamis, Melanie, Comparative Advantage, Segmentation and Informal Earnings: A Marginal Treatment Effects Approach. IZA Discussion Paper No. 3916, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1329554

Omar Arias (Contact Author)

World Bank ( email )

1818 H Street, NW
Washington, DC 20433
United States

Melanie Khamis

IZA Institute of Labor Economics ( email )

P.O. Box 7240
Bonn, D-53072
Germany

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
165
Abstract Views
948
rank
223,368
PlumX Metrics