Protecting Children on the Internet: Mission Impossible?

Audrey Rogers

Pace University - School of Law


Baylor Law Review, Vol. 61, 2009

Congress's latest effort to protect children from on-line predators banned the pandering or soliciting of child pornography regardless of whether the images were actual or virtual. My paper discusses last term's Supreme Court decision in United States v. Williams that upheld the prohibition and ruled that an offer to engage in illegal activity is unprotected speech. I place Williams within the larger context of the classic impossibility defense that differentiates between factually and legally frustrated attempts, and show how the majority and dissenting opinions fall into these two camps. I propose that the revival of the impossibility debate sparked by Internet cases is misguided and that, in fact, the Internet provides the best reason for rejecting impossibility as a bar to prosecuting predators.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 34

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: January 21, 2009 ; Last revised: October 18, 2009

Suggested Citation

Rogers, Audrey, Protecting Children on the Internet: Mission Impossible? (2009). Baylor Law Review, Vol. 61, 2009. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1330628 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1330628

Contact Information

Audrey Rogers (Contact Author)
Pace University - School of Law ( email )
78 North Broadway
White Plains, NY 10603
United States
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,457
Downloads: 187
Download Rank: 127,831