The Devil's Account: Men, Morals, and Constitutional Goods

24 Pages Posted: 26 Jan 2009

See all articles by Thomas M. Poole

Thomas M. Poole

London School of Economics - Law School

Date Written: January 22, 2009


Alan Brudner's constitutional theory offers us an ideal constitution or 'heaven of laws'. His theory maps a constitution heavy with law. Law permeates and supports a host of dense networks and relationships between individuals, communities and the state. It also specifies a very comprehensive set of rights. These detailed prescriptions are designed to take constitutional form, with the result that they are removed largely from the remit of normal political and ideological debate. This paper probes this vision of constitutional order. It focuses on two particularly revealing aspects of the theory - its Aristotelian perfectionism and the educative role it affords the state. Drawing on an older tradition of liberal thought exemplified by Hume, the paper concludes that the extremely 'thick' legal constitution of the type Brudner presents is not one to which liberals should subscribe. His 'heaven of laws', since it envisages a state of political changelessness, amounts ultimately to a particular sort of tyranny in which the individual is trapped once more by the bonds of fate.

Suggested Citation

Poole, Thomas M., The Devil's Account: Men, Morals, and Constitutional Goods (January 22, 2009). LSE Legal Studies Working Paper No. 1/2009, Available at SSRN: or

Thomas M. Poole (Contact Author)

London School of Economics - Law School ( email )

Houghton Street
London WC2A 2AE, WC2A 2AE
United Kingdom


Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics