What Could Anti-Trust in the OECD Mean for Development?

DE BLIJVENDE UITDAGING, P.A. Kalbfleisch et al., The Hague, 2009, pp. 165-179

Institute of Social Studies Working Paper No. 473

19 Pages Posted: 6 May 2009 Last revised: 20 Jul 2009

See all articles by Peter A. G. van Bergeijk

Peter A. G. van Bergeijk

Erasmus University - Institute of Social Studies (ISS)

Date Written: May 1, 2009

Abstract

The extra-territorial effects of cartels, mergers and other non-competitive activities require consideration especially if they harm consumers and firms in developing countries. This chapter provides an overview of the available empirical literature regarding the impact of cartels, mergers and abuses of dominance and that are rooted in the OECD. Typically the available evidence is not yet sufficiently comprehensive to allow robust conclusions, but (with no claim on accuracy), it seems reasonable that the direct impact on developing countries is very substantial and in welfare terms may exceed the contribution by Official Development Aid. OECD countries could contribute to development through the activities of their competition authorities and appropriate changes in legislation.

Keywords: cartel, merger, restrictive business practices, developing countries, competition policy

JEL Classification: O1, L4

Suggested Citation

van Bergeijk, Peter A.G., What Could Anti-Trust in the OECD Mean for Development? (May 1, 2009). DE BLIJVENDE UITDAGING, P.A. Kalbfleisch et al., The Hague, 2009, pp. 165-179; Institute of Social Studies Working Paper No. 473. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1331830

Peter A.G. Van Bergeijk (Contact Author)

Erasmus University - Institute of Social Studies (ISS) ( email )

PO Box 29776
2502 LT The Hague, 2518 AX
Netherlands

HOME PAGE: http://www.economie.blogspot.com

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
103
Abstract Views
820
rank
269,908
PlumX Metrics