Liquidity Transformation: Open-End Versus Closed-End Funds
37 Pages Posted: 24 Jan 2009 Last revised: 3 Nov 2011
Date Written: November 1, 2003
Abstract
Open-end funds in a relevant scale as an investment for the general public are internationally found only in Germany. All attempts to establish open-end funds as an investment for general public in Great Britain, Australia or the Netherlands were essentially in vain. The Swiss open-end funds, upon which the German legislation was originally based on, also turn out to be closed-end funds, due to several amendments, by now.
The discrepancy between the illiquidity of the property and the permanent issuance and withdrawal of shares has proves to be particularly problematic. A systematic analyses, how open-end funds have to be designed, to fulfill this antagonism is missing so far. This article tries to close this gap.
Note: Downloadable document is in German.
Keywords: Open-end funds, closed-end funds
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
The Relative Importance of Stock, Bond and Real Estate Factors in Explaining REIT Returns
By Jim Clayton and Greg H. Mackinnon
-
Debt, Agency and Management Contracts in Reits: The External Advisor Puzzle
By Dennis R. Capozza and Paul J. Seguin
-
Measuring and Explaining Changes in REIT Liquidity: Moving Beyond the Bid/Ask Spread
By Jim Clayton and Greg H. Mackinnon