Liquidity Transformation: Open-End Versus Closed-End Funds

37 Pages Posted: 24 Jan 2009 Last revised: 3 Nov 2011

See all articles by Steffen P. Sebastian

Steffen P. Sebastian

University of Regensburg - International Real Estate Business School (IREBS)

Date Written: November 1, 2003

Abstract

Open-end funds in a relevant scale as an investment for the general public are internationally found only in Germany. All attempts to establish open-end funds as an investment for general public in Great Britain, Australia or the Netherlands were essentially in vain. The Swiss open-end funds, upon which the German legislation was originally based on, also turn out to be closed-end funds, due to several amendments, by now.

The discrepancy between the illiquidity of the property and the permanent issuance and withdrawal of shares has proves to be particularly problematic. A systematic analyses, how open-end funds have to be designed, to fulfill this antagonism is missing so far. This article tries to close this gap.

Note: Downloadable document is in German.

Keywords: Open-end funds, closed-end funds

Suggested Citation

Sebastian, Steffen P., Liquidity Transformation: Open-End Versus Closed-End Funds (November 1, 2003). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1332133 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1332133

Steffen P. Sebastian (Contact Author)

University of Regensburg - International Real Estate Business School (IREBS) ( email )

Universitaetsstrasse 31
Regenburg, Bavaria 93040
Germany
+49(941)943-5081 (Phone)
+49(941)943-5082 (Fax)

HOME PAGE: http://www.irebs.de