What Interests are Served When Academic Law Library Directors are Tenured Law Faculty? An Analysis and Proposal

Journal of Legal Education, Vol. 58, p. 245, 2008

U of Houston Law Center No. 2009-A-8

30 Pages Posted: 26 Jan 2009 Last revised: 18 Feb 2009

Spencer Simons

University of Houston Law Center

Date Written: January 26, 2009

Abstract

A question of increasing concern is whether academic law library directors should be tenured law faculty. ABA standard 603(d) provides that directors should hold faculty appointments with security of faculty position, and not in the administrative position of director. Nonetheless, some directors are not tenured or tenure-track law faculty. Many believe the number of directors hired on other than tenure-track appointments is increasing. The article discusses the anomalous position of directors, presents original research results on scholarly productivity and teaching of directors, explores whether the traditional rationales for academic tenure apply to directors, evaluates directors' stated reasons for seeking tenure, and analyzes the functional benefits and disadvantages of director tenure for directors, faculty, and administrations. A form of employment providing the functional benefits of the tenure process, while ameliorating the problems of tenure, is proposed.

Keywords: law library, library director, tenure, ABA 603(d)

Suggested Citation

Simons, Spencer, What Interests are Served When Academic Law Library Directors are Tenured Law Faculty? An Analysis and Proposal (January 26, 2009). Journal of Legal Education, Vol. 58, p. 245, 2008; U of Houston Law Center No. 2009-A-8. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1333223

Spencer Simons (Contact Author)

University of Houston Law Center ( email )

4604 Calhoun Road
Houston, TX 77204-6060
United States

Paper statistics

Downloads
177
Rank
138,698
Abstract Views
795