Restricting Consumer Credit Access: Household Survey Evidence on Effects around the Oregon Rate Cap
24 Pages Posted: 2 Feb 2009
Date Written: December 2008
Abstract
Many policymakers and some behavioral models hold that restricting access to expensive credit helps consumers by preventing overborrowing. I examine some short-run effects of restricting access, using household panel survey data on payday loan users collected around the imposition of binding restrictions on payday loan terms in Oregon. The results suggest that borrowing fell in Oregon relative to Washington, with former payday loan users shifting partially into plausibly inferior substitutes. Additional evidence suggests that restricting access caused deterioration in the overall financial condition of the Oregon households. The results suggest that restricting access to expensive credit harms consumers on average.
Keywords: payday loan, subprime credit market, predatory lending, usury, interest rate
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Payday Lenders: Heroes or Villains?
By Adair Morse
-
Do Payday Loans Cause Bankruptcy?
By Paige Marta Skiba and Jeremy Tobacman
-
Payday Loans, Uncertainty and Discounting: Explaining Patterns of Borrowing, Repayment, and Default
By Paige Marta Skiba and Jeremy Tobacman
-
Information Disclosure, Cognitive Biases and Payday Borrowing
By Marianne Bertrand and Adair Morse
-
Information Disclosure, Cognitive Biases and Payday Borrowing
By Marianne Bertrand and Adair Morse
-
Payday Holiday: How Households Fare After Payday Credit Bans
-
What do High-Interest Borrowers do with Their Tax Rebate?
By Marianne Bertrand and Adair Morse
-
In Harm's Way? Payday Loan Access and Military Personnel Performance
By Scott E. Carrell and Jonathan Zinman