Too-Big-To-Fail, Government Bailouts, and Managerial Incentives: The Case of Reconstruction Finance Corporation Assistance to the Railroad Industry During the Great Depression
39 Pages Posted: 4 Feb 2009
Date Written: October 15, 2002
Abstract
Transportation infrastructure has long been thought to be important to economic growth and development. Hence, financial difficulties in the transportation industry have often been considered too-big-to-fail and, as a result, elicited government assistance. Turnpikes, canals, railroads, and airlines have all received government assistance through US history. However, it is unclear whether such assistance helps the target companies recover or just postpones their inevitable demise. The normative public policy bias toward transportation infrastructure seems to be "better too much of a public good (and hence assistance toward that public good) than too little." However, while that normative bias may at first glance appear reasonable, assistance has long been suspected of skewing investment incentives away from those that would obtain in the absence of that assistance.
Keywords: Reconstruction Finance Corporation, RFC, Banking, Railroads, Public Policy
JEL Classification: G21, G28, G34
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Bank Asset Liquidation and the Propagation of the U.S. Great Depression
By Joseph R. Mason, James W. Kolari, ...
-
A Real Options Approach to Bankruptcy Costs: Evidence from Failed Commercial Banks During the 1990s