Price Gouging, Non-Worseness, and Distributive Justice

Business Ethics Quarterly, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 295-306, April 2009

8 Pages Posted: 5 Feb 2009  

Matt Zwolinski

University of San Diego; University of San Diego School of Law

Date Written: February 4, 2009

Abstract

This paper develops my position on the ethics of price gouging in response to Jeremy Snyder's article, "What's the Matter with Price Gouging." First, it explains how the "nonworseness claim" supports the moral permissibility of price gouging, even if it does not show that price gougers are morally virtuous agents. Second, it argues that questions about price gouging and distributive justice must be answered in light of the relevant possible institutional alternatives, and that Snyder's proposed alternatives to price gouging fare worse on the dimension of justice than a system in which goods are allocated by a system of market prices.

Keywords: price gouging, exploitation, distributive justice

JEL Classification: D45, D46, D61, D63, I31

Suggested Citation

Zwolinski, Matt, Price Gouging, Non-Worseness, and Distributive Justice (February 4, 2009). Business Ethics Quarterly, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 295-306, April 2009. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1337654

Matt Zwolinski (Contact Author)

University of San Diego ( email )

5998 Alcala Park
San Diego, CA 92110-2492
United States
619-260-4094 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: http://www.sandiego.edu/~mzwolinski

University of San Diego School of Law ( email )

5998 Alcala Park
San Diego, CA 92110-2492
United States

Paper statistics

Downloads
485
Rank
46,901
Abstract Views
2,797