Footnotes (144)



Creating a Paternalistic Market for Legal Rules Affecting the Benefit Promise

Brendan S. Maher

University of Connecticut School of Law

November 14, 2008

Wisconsin Law Review, Vol. 2009

Notwithstanding the fact that ERISA was enacted to protect employee benefits, courts have narrowly construed the relief available when benefits are denied, out of concern that a stronger remedy would be too costly for the system to bear. Judges, I argue, are ill-equipped to make this policy judgment. Instead, a regulated, subsidized, paternalistic market should be created to permit the benefit players themselves to choose and price the strength of the remedy they desire. This is a superior means to reach the right level of remedial strength for the most players. To protect against undesirably weak remedial options being selected, I propose the market should have a highly protective default remedial option, clear disclosure rules, subsidies, and a regulatory floor.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 36

Keywords: ERISA, pensions, health care, benefits

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: February 5, 2009 ; Last revised: May 7, 2009

Suggested Citation

Maher, Brendan S., Creating a Paternalistic Market for Legal Rules Affecting the Benefit Promise (November 14, 2008). Wisconsin Law Review, Vol. 2009. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1337735

Contact Information

Brendan S. Maher (Contact Author)
University of Connecticut School of Law ( email )
65 Elizabeth Street
Hartford, CT 06105
United States
HOME PAGE: http://www.law.uconn.edu/faculty/profiles/brendan-s-maher
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 558
Downloads: 68
Download Rank: 268,960
Footnotes:  144