40 Pages Posted: 5 Feb 2009 Last revised: 2 Mar 2009
Date Written: February 4, 2009
We analyze corporate fraud in a model in which managers have superior information but are biased against liquidation, because of their private benefits from empire building. This may induce them to misreport information and even bribe auditors when liquidation would be value-increasing. To curb fraud, shareholders optimally choose auditing quality and the performance sensitivity of managerial pay, taking external corporate governance and auditing regulation into account. For given managerial pay, it is optimal to rely on auditing when external governance is in an intermediate range. When both auditing and incentive pay are used, worse external governance must be balanced by heavier reliance on both of those incentive mechanisms. In designing managerial pay, equity can improve managerial incentives while stock options worsen them.
Keywords: accounting fraud, auditing, managerial compensation, corporate governance, regulation
JEL Classification: G28, K22, M42
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Immordino, Giovanni and Pagano, Marco, Corporate Fraud, Governance and Auditing (February 4, 2009). EFA 2009 Bergen Meetings Paper. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1337909 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1337909
By Gene Imhoff