The Economics of Clearing in Derivatives Markets: Netting, Asymmetric Information, and the Sharing of Default Risks Through a Central Counterparty
78 Pages Posted: 11 Feb 2009
Date Written: January 8, 2009
Abstract
Credit derivatives have received intense scrutiny -- and criticism -- as a major contributor to the ongoing financial crisis. In response, regulators have proposed requiring the formation of a central clearinghouse to share default risk on these contracts. A comparative economic analysis of the costs and benefits of alternative default risk sharing mechanisms casts considerable doubt on the advisability of central clearing of credit derivatives. These products are likely to be subject to severe information asymmetry problems regarding their value, risk, and the creditworthiness of those who trade them, and these information asymmetries are likely to be less severe in bilateral markets than in centrally cleared systems. Moreover, although regulators have argued that clearing would reduce systemic risk, a more complete analysis demonstrates that clearing could actually increase risks to the broader financial system.
Keywords: derivatives, default risk, counterparty risk, clearing
JEL Classification: G18, G21, G28
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Does a Central Clearing Counterparty Reduce Counterparty Risk?
By Darrell Duffie and Haoxiang Zhu
-
Credit Default Swaps and the Empty Creditor Problem
By Patrick Bolton and Martin Oehmke
-
The Bear's Lair: Indexed Credit Default Swaps and the Subprime Mortgage Crisis
By Richard Stanton and Nancy Wallace
-
One Share-One Vote is Unenforceable and Sub-Optimal
By Avner Kalay and Shagun Pant
-
Contracting Innovations and the Evolution of Clearing and Settlement Methods at Futures Exchanges