State Contracts with Aliens: The Question of Unilateral Change by the State In Contemporary International Law

Journal of International Arbitration, Vol. 9, No. 4, p. 141, 1992

22 Pages Posted: 14 Jan 2012

See all articles by A. F. M. Maniruzzaman

A. F. M. Maniruzzaman

University of Portsmouth - School of Law; Centre for Energy, Petroleum and Mineral Law and Policy, University of Dundee; Faculty of International Law, China University of Political Science and Law

Date Written: 1992

Abstract

The question of absolute application of the principle of pacta sunt servanda to the contractual relationship between a State and a foreign private investor has given rise to a serious controversy among jurists and legal practitioners. Those who support the concept of absolute sanctity of contract buttress their view by referring to a handful of awards by international tribunals where the concept was upheld. They also try to characterize it as a general principle of law by having recourse to different major legal systems of the world. Some scholars have made efforts to assimilate the contract between a State and a foreign private party to an inter-State treaty in order to extend the application of pacta sunt servanda, a fundamental rule of treaty law, to the former. The purpose of this article is to examine, in the light of the major legal systems of the world, international law and State practices, whether there still exists that nineteenth century heritage, the notion of absolute sanctity of contract which was a characteristic feature of laissez-faire individualism. It will be shown that no principle of absolute sanctity of contract exists as such. The principle is qualified by many exceptions in both municipal and international law.

Keywords: State Contracts, Mutability, Changed Circumstances, Public Contracts

JEL Classification: K33, K12

Suggested Citation

Maniruzzaman, A. F. M., State Contracts with Aliens: The Question of Unilateral Change by the State In Contemporary International Law (1992). Journal of International Arbitration, Vol. 9, No. 4, p. 141, 1992. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1342337

A. F. M. Maniruzzaman (Contact Author)

University of Portsmouth - School of Law ( email )

Richmond Building
Portsmouth, Hampshire PO1 3DE
United Kingdom
+44 (0)2392844194 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: http://www.port.ac.uk/departments/academic/law/staff/title,23599,en.html

Centre for Energy, Petroleum and Mineral Law and Policy, University of Dundee ( email )

Nethergate
Dundee, Scotland DD1 4HN
United Kingdom

Faculty of International Law, China University of Political Science and Law ( email )

Beijing
China

HOME PAGE: http://www.cupl.edu.cn:81/sites/en/School_EN_new_Index.jsp

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
207
Abstract Views
853
rank
148,065
PlumX Metrics