Citations (1)


Footnotes (163)



Intent to Contract

Gregory Klass

Georgetown University Law Center

July 31, 2009

Virginia Law Review, Vol. 95, p. 1437, 2009
Georgetown Law and Economics Research Paper No. 09-07
Georgetown Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper No. 09-07

There is a remarkable difference between black-letter contract laws of the United States and England. In England, the existence of a contract is supposedly conditioned on the parties' intent to be legally bound, while section 21 of the Second Restatement of Contracts states that "[n]either real nor apparent intention that a promise be legally binding is essential to the formation of a contract." There are also differences within U.S. law on the issue. While section 21 describes courts' approach to most contracts, the parties' intent to contact can be a condition of validity of preliminary agreements, domestic agreements and social arrangements, reporters' promises of confidentiality to sources, and gratuitous promises.

This Article develops an analytic framework for evaluating these rules and examines their relationship to the broader principles that animate contract law. Rules that condition contractual liability on proof of contractual intent must include rules for interpreting that intent. Those interpretive rules will include both interpretive defaults and rules for what it takes to opt-out of the default. By adjusting these default and opt-out rules, the law can achieve different balances between the duty-imposing and power-conferring functions of contract law, or among the various reasons for enforcement. This is demonstrated by an analysis of the rules for gratuitous promises, preliminary agreements, spousal agreements and reporters' confidentiality promises. The results of that analysis include a new argument for the Model Written Obligations Act; a critique of Alan Schwartz and Robert Scott's proposal preliminary agreements and a recommended alternative to it; and recommended changes to the rules for agreements between spouses. Attention to intent to contract requirements also indicates an overlooked aspect of how the enforcement of contracts affects extralegal norms and relationships of trust. Interpretive rules that require parties who want, or who do not want, legal liability expressly to say so are particularly likely to interfere with or erode extralegal forms trust that otherwise create value in transactions.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 68

Keywords: contract, contract theory, intent to contract, relational contracts, gratuitous promises, preliminary agreements, domestic agreements, reporters' confidentiality promises

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: February 23, 2009 ; Last revised: July 29, 2010

Suggested Citation

Klass, Gregory, Intent to Contract (July 31, 2009). Virginia Law Review, Vol. 95, p. 1437, 2009; Georgetown Law and Economics Research Paper No. 09-07; Georgetown Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper No. 09-07. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1345172

Contact Information

Gregory Klass (Contact Author)
Georgetown University Law Center ( email )
600 New Jersey Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20001
United States
HOME PAGE: http://www.law.georgetown.edu/curriculum/tab_faculty.cfm?Status=Faculty&Detail=2165
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,707
Downloads: 423
Download Rank: 52,700
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  163