Itemizing Personhood

29 Virginia Tax Review 93 (2009).

Bar Ilan Univ. Pub Law Working Paper No. 08-09

46 Pages Posted: 24 Feb 2009 Last revised: 20 May 2017

See all articles by Tsilly Dagan

Tsilly Dagan

University of Oxford, Faculty of Law; Bar Ilan University

Date Written: February 14, 2009

Abstract

This Article argues that tax law has a significant role in the design of non-market interactions. Tax law often translates real life into tax terms, and constructs our daily rituals as either non-deductible, personal consumption or deductible income-producing expenses. It depicts relationships as either taxable market transactions or as philanthropic, amicable, or domestic non-market ones. It characterizes some benefits as taxable fringe benefits and others as non-taxable psychological benefits. It taxes work but not leisure, sales but not gifts; it allows the deduction of travel expenses but not the costs of commuting, of secretarial help but not of childcare. In this Article, I argue that many of these notoriously puzzling distinctions express a set of closely related commitments to distinguish the market from the non-market realms. Drawing on the rich body of literature on commodification, the Article develops a new framework for the tax treatment of the non-market realm: It starts by identifying four distinct ways in which tax and commodification can interact: incentivizing non-market interactions; encouraging resource materialization; price-tagging of goods and services; and making the government a partner in taxable interactions. The Article then uses this framework to shed a new light on several controversial tax policy questions, such as taxing imputed income, taxing endowments, and disallowing personal deductions.

The Article does not view commodification as inherently harmful. Rather, it identifies several novel strategies for using tax law in modularly managing commodification's various dimensions. Tax law's pliability, I argue, allows policymakers to distinguish the sore aspects of commodification from its other, potentially desirable functions, and to encourage only the latter. This analysis does not only provide a new perspective for evaluating tax policy, but also provides the commodification literature with a unique set of tools for effectively addressing commodification concerns.

Keywords: Taxation, Tax Policy, Commodification

JEL Classification: H20, H29

Suggested Citation

Dagan, Tsilly, Itemizing Personhood (February 14, 2009). 29 Virginia Tax Review 93 (2009).; Bar Ilan Univ. Pub Law Working Paper No. 08-09. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1345391 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1345391

Tsilly Dagan (Contact Author)

University of Oxford, Faculty of Law ( email )

St Cross Building
St Cross Rd
Oxford, OX1 3UL
United Kingdom

Bar Ilan University ( email )

Ramat Gan
Ramat Gan, 52900
Israel

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
176
Abstract Views
1,291
rank
183,270
PlumX Metrics