Implied Jurisprudence

43 Pages Posted: 26 Feb 2009

See all articles by Patrick Gudridge

Patrick Gudridge

University of Miami - School of Law

Date Written: February 26, 2009

Abstract

Courts sometimes (but not always) treat as proper starting points for litigation alleged violations of statutory provisions that do not by their terms provide for rights to bring suit. Judicial opinions addressing the matter often include some more or less abstract accounts of the action-fitting features present or absent in the statutory terms at issue. Implied right of action questions thus beget jurisprudence -- if not worked-out legal theory, at the least orienting expectations about legal form. The United States Supreme Court in particular has faced and resolved the implied right question in a goodly number of cases over the course of this century -- mostly in two clusters of opinions, first in the period from the mid-1920s to the mid-1940s, and second in a twenty-year period beginning in the mid-1970s. The subject of this article is the assumptions that the Court's work reveals.

Suggested Citation

Gudridge, Patrick, Implied Jurisprudence (February 26, 2009). University of Miami Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2009-05, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1349825 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1349825

Patrick Gudridge (Contact Author)

University of Miami - School of Law ( email )

P.O. Box 248087
Coral Gables, FL 33146
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
43
Abstract Views
436
PlumX Metrics