The Restatement of the Obvious: Or, What's Right Got to Do With It?

Regent Law Review, Vol. 16, p. 301, 2004

52 Pages Posted: 1 Mar 2009 Last revised: 13 Mar 2009

See all articles by Thomas Folsom

Thomas Folsom

Regent University School of Law

Date Written: 2004

Abstract

A variation of Moral Realism, as specified in Appendix One of this essay, is a non-proprietary, non-sectarian, and non-antiquarian set of foundational principles upon which a rule of law, grounded in morality and history and balanced by analytic and pragmatic concerns, can be established among free and equal citizens. A restatement at this level of generality is both possible and highly desirable. This essay proposes a first tentative draft of such a restatement.

Keywords: Moral realism, Restatement of the obvious, Modern moral realism, Normative jurisprudence

Suggested Citation

Folsom, Thomas C., The Restatement of the Obvious: Or, What's Right Got to Do With It? (2004). Regent Law Review, Vol. 16, p. 301, 2004. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1350998

Thomas C. Folsom (Contact Author)

Regent University School of Law ( email )

1000 Regent University Drive
Virginia Beach, VA 23464
United States

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
64
Abstract Views
627
rank
372,220
PlumX Metrics