Can Contracts Solve the Hold-Up Problem? Experimental Evidence

43 Pages Posted: 6 Mar 2009 Last revised: 15 Dec 2010

See all articles by Eva I. Hoppe

Eva I. Hoppe

University of Cologne - Department of Economics

Patrick W. Schmitz

University of Cologne; Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR)

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: November 5, 2010

Abstract

In the contract-theoretic literature, there is a vital debate about whether contracts can mitigate the hold-up problem, in particular when renegotiation cannot be prevented. Ultimately, this question has to be answered empirically. As a first step, we have conducted a laboratory experiment with 960 participants. We consider investments that directly benefit the non-investing party. While according to standard theory, contracting would be useless if renegotiation cannot be ruled out, we find that option contracts significantly improve investment incentives compared to a no-contract treatment. This finding might be attributed to Hart and Moore's (2008) recent idea that contracts can serve as reference points.

Keywords: Hold-up problem, option contracts, renegotiation, experiment

JEL Classification: D86, C72, C91

Suggested Citation

Hoppe, Eva I. and Schmitz, Patrick W., Can Contracts Solve the Hold-Up Problem? Experimental Evidence (November 5, 2010). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1351777 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1351777

Eva I. Hoppe

University of Cologne - Department of Economics ( email )

Cologne, 50923
Germany

Patrick W. Schmitz (Contact Author)

University of Cologne ( email )

Albertus-Magnus-Platz
Cologne, 50923
Germany

HOME PAGE: http://schmitz.uni-koeln.de/index.php?s=mitarbeiter&t=schmitz

Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR)

London
United Kingdom

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
486
Abstract Views
1,928
Rank
100,969
PlumX Metrics