18 Pages Posted: 6 Mar 2009
Date Written: March 6, 2009
This article examines some of the perverse consequences of the structure of the Endangered Species Act, namely that it deters property owners from conserving threatened species and lacks proactive measures.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Ruhl, J. B., The Endangered Species Act and Private Property: A Matter of Timing and Location (March 6, 2009). Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy, Vol. 8, 1998-1999; FSU College of Law, Public Law Research Paper. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1354724