The Endangered Species Act and Private Property: A Matter of Timing and Location
18 Pages Posted: 6 Mar 2009
Date Written: March 6, 2009
Abstract
This article examines some of the perverse consequences of the structure of the Endangered Species Act, namely that it deters property owners from conserving threatened species and lacks proactive measures.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Paper statistics
Recommended Papers
-
Preemptive Habitat Destruction Under the Endangered Species Act
By Dean Lueck and Jeffrey A. Michael
-
Donning Coase-Coloured Glasses: A Property Rights View of Natural Resource Economics
-
Regulation and the Natural Progress of Opulence
By Sam Peltzman
-
Assessing the Impacts of the Prescription Drug User Fee Acts (Pdufa) on the Fda Approval Process
By Ernst R. Berndt, Adrian Gottschalk, ...
-
The Optimal Allocation of Water Along a System of Rivers: A Continuous Model with Sequential Bidding
By Alex Coram
-
Is the Endangered Species Act Endangering Species?
By John A. List, Michael Margolis, ...
-
Endangered Species and Timber Harvesting: The Case of Red-Cockaded Woodpeckers
By Daowei Zhang
-
Economic Land Use, Ecosystem Services and Microfounded Species Dynamics
By Rudiger Pethig and Thomas Eichner