Are Stocks Really Less Volatile in the Long Run?
48 Pages Posted: 11 Mar 2009
There are 3 versions of this paper
Are Stocks Really Less Volatile in the Long Run?
Are Stocks Really Less Volatile in the Long Run?
Date Written: March 2009
Abstract
Conventional wisdom views stocks as less volatile over long horizons than over short horizons due to mean reversion induced by return predictability. In contrast, we find stocks are substantially more volatile over long horizons from an investor's perspective. This perspective recognizes that parameters are uncertain, even with two centuries of data, and that observable predictors imperfectly deliver the conditional expected return. We decompose return variance into five components, which include mean reversion and various uncertainties faced by the investor. Although mean reversion makes a strong negative contribution to long-horizon variance, it is more than offset by the other components. Using a predictive system, we estimate annualized 30-year variance to be nearly 1.5 times the 1-year variance.
Keywords: long-run, risk, stock, variance
JEL Classification: G11, G23
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Consumption and Portfolio Decisions When Expected Returns are Time Varying
By John Y. Campbell and Luis M. Viceira
-
On the Predictability of Stock Returns: An Asset-Allocation Perspective
-
Who Should Buy Long-Term Bonds?
By John Y. Campbell and Luis M. Viceira
-
Who Should Buy Long-Term Bonds?
By John Y. Campbell and Luis M. Viceira
-
A Multivariate Model of Strategic Asset Allocation
By John Y. Campbell, Yeung Lewis Chan, ...
-
A Multivariate Model of Strategic Asset Allocation
By John Y. Campbell, Yeung Lewis Chan, ...
-
Dynamic Consumption and Portfolio Choice with Stochastic Volatility in Incomplete Markets
By George Chacko and Luis M. Viceira
-
Dynamic Consumption and Portfolio Choice with Stochastic Volatility in Incomplete Markets
By George Chacko and Luis M. Viceira