Commentary on the Judgment of the ICTY Appeals Chamber in the Case of Prosecutor v. Milorad Krnojelac

ANNOTATED LEADING CASES OF INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL TRIBUNALS, Vol. 14: INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE FORMER YUGOSLAVIA, 2003, André Klip and Göran Sluiter, eds., pp. 841-846, Intersentia, 2008

6 Pages Posted: 12 Mar 2009 Last revised: 4 Nov 2015

See all articles by Alexander Zahar

Alexander Zahar

Southwest University of Political Science and Law

Date Written: December 1, 2008

Abstract

The judgment of the ICTY Appeals Chamber in the Krnojelac case in September 2003 underscores the fact that the ICTY Trial Chambers still, at that stage, had no grip on the doctrine of joint criminal enterprise (JCE) that had been cobbled together four years earlier by the Appeals Chamber in the Tadic case. In Krnojelac, the Appeals Chamber once again usurped the role of the Trial Chamber and applied a refurbished JCE doctrine to factual findings it had not itself made. Krnojelac's term of imprisonment was doubled, in this appeal, to 15 years.

Keywords: Krnojelac case, ICTY, joint criminal enterprise, Tadic

Suggested Citation

Zahar, Alexander, Commentary on the Judgment of the ICTY Appeals Chamber in the Case of Prosecutor v. Milorad Krnojelac (December 1, 2008). ANNOTATED LEADING CASES OF INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL TRIBUNALS, Vol. 14: INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE FORMER YUGOSLAVIA, 2003, André Klip and Göran Sluiter, eds., pp. 841-846, Intersentia, 2008, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1357998

Alexander Zahar (Contact Author)

Southwest University of Political Science and Law ( email )

Chongqing
China

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
94
Abstract Views
594
rank
304,206
PlumX Metrics