Some Observations About Jewish Law in Israel's Supreme Court

Washington University Global Studies Law Review, Vol. 8, No. 4, 2009

42 Pages Posted: 19 Mar 2009 Last revised: 9 Oct 2009

Date Written: September 28, 2009

Abstract

This Article considers whether the Israeli Supreme Court’s effort to incorporate the parts of Jewish law that deal with secular subjects is internally flawed. The use of Jewish law differs from the use of the law of other jurisdictions. Typically courts rely on other jurisdictions’ precedents to show that a rule is practical, that the court is not overstepping its authority, and that adoption of the rule will lead to interstate or international uniformity. The use of Jewish law does not satisfy the goals. There is concern that the religious elements of Jewish law are pervasive and that much of Jewish law is not well suited for a modern society. This Article considers the approach of looking to Jewish law, not for specific rules that will be applied, but as a storehouse from which one can seek enlightenment. Even under this approach, this Article finds that some Israeli Supreme Court cases have misapplied Jewish law either by taking Jewish law out of context or by reading modern legal concepts into Jewish law. This Article suggests ways that some of these cases could have better employed Jewish law and also describes cases that have properly done so. It concludes that, when used properly, Jewish law can help to link Israeli law to a rich cultural heritage.

Keywords: Jewish law, Israel, comparative law

Suggested Citation

Friedell, Steven F., Some Observations About Jewish Law in Israel's Supreme Court (September 28, 2009). Washington University Global Studies Law Review, Vol. 8, No. 4, 2009, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1360225

Steven F. Friedell (Contact Author)

Rutgers Law School ( email )

Newark, NJ
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
113
Abstract Views
593
Rank
466,910
PlumX Metrics