A Theory of WTO Adjudication: From Empirical Analysis to Biased Rule Development

57 Pages Posted: 19 Mar 2009

See all articles by Juscelino F. Colares

Juscelino F. Colares

Case Western Reserve University School of Law

Date Written: March 18, 2009

Abstract

The positive theory of litigation predicts that, under certain conditions, plaintiffs and defendants achieve an unremarkable and roughly equivalent share of litigation success. This Article, grounded in an empirical analysis of WTO adjudication from 1995 through 2007, reveals a high disparity between Complainant and Respondent success rates: Complainants win roughly ninety percent of the disputes. This disparity transcends case type, party identity, income level, and other litigant-specific characteristics. After analyzing and discarding standard empirical and theoretical alternative explanations for the systematic disparity in success rates, this study demonstrates, through an examination of patterns in WTO adjudicators' notorious decisions, that biased rule development explains this disparity. This Article then discusses the effect of biased rule development on perceptions of the WTO dispute settlement system's democratic legitimacy and legality.

Keywords: WTO, Dispute settlement, international trade, positive theory of litigation, empirical legal studies

JEL Classification: K33, K41

Suggested Citation

Colares, Juscelino F., A Theory of WTO Adjudication: From Empirical Analysis to Biased Rule Development (March 18, 2009). Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, Vol. 42, No. 2, 2009. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1363912

Juscelino F. Colares (Contact Author)

Case Western Reserve University School of Law ( email )

11075 East Boulevard
Cleveland, OH 44106-7148
United States

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
263
Abstract Views
1,519
rank
124,908
PlumX Metrics