Footnotes (92)



A Conditional Intent to Perform

Gregory Klass

Georgetown University Law Center

March 18, 2009

Legal Theory, Vol. 15, p. 107-147, 2009
Georgetown Public Law Research No. 09-08

No promisor intends to perform come what may. Yet some undisclosed conditions on a promisor's intent are so material that they can support a claim of fraud. A theory of promissory fraud should be able distinguish such foreground conditions on a promisor's intent to perform from the background conditions that attach to all intentions. Michael Bratman's planning theory of intention provides resources to explain the difference. A background condition is one that the agent accepts as satisfied or not satisfied in her practical reasoning; a foreground condition is one whose satisfaction she treats as an open question. Foreground conditions permit an agent to plan for futures in which she does not perform the act in question and reduce the rational pressure to adopt necessary means of performing it. Background conditions do neither.

This planning theory of conditional intentions provides a more complete account of why a promisee should care about foreground conditions on the promisor's intent to perform. An undisclosed foreground condition is likely material not only because it reduces probability of performance (background conditions do that too), but also because it is likely to affect the promisor's preperformance deliberations and behavior. The promisor is more likely to continue planning for possible futures in which she does not perform and less likely to invest in necessary means of performance. A foreground condition on the promisor's intent to perform also reduces the rational pressure to fill contract gaps in ways that accord or mesh with the promisee's plans and preferences, as described by the theory of shared intentions. These conclusions suggest revisions to the analysis of what a promise says about the promisor's intent to perform and any conditions on it. They also supply the beginning of a philosophical account of the relationship-based, extralegal expectations and obligations that attend agreements for consideration, and of the law's proper response to them.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 42

Keywords: contract, promissory fraud, intent, intent to perform, conditional intent, relational contracts, shared intention, Bratman

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: March 19, 2009 ; Last revised: February 17, 2011

Suggested Citation

Klass, Gregory, A Conditional Intent to Perform (March 18, 2009). Legal Theory, Vol. 15, p. 107-147, 2009; Georgetown Public Law Research No. 09-08. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1364456

Contact Information

Gregory Klass (Contact Author)
Georgetown University Law Center ( email )
600 New Jersey Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20001
United States
HOME PAGE: http://www.law.georgetown.edu/curriculum/tab_faculty.cfm?Status=Faculty&Detail=2165
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 787
Downloads: 118
Download Rank: 188,280
Footnotes:  92