Citations (2)


Footnotes (317)



Nobody's Fools: The Rational Audience as First Amendment Ideal

Lyrissa Barnett Lidsky

University of Florida - Levin College of Law

March 20, 2009

University of Florida Levin College of Law Research Paper No. 2009-19
University of Illinois Law Review, Forthcoming

Assumptions about audiences shape the outcomes of First Amendment cases. Yet the Supreme Court rarely specifies what its assumptions about audiences are, much less attempts to justify them. Drawing on literary theory, this Article identifies and defends two critical assumptions that emerge from First Amendment cases involving so-called "core" speech. The first is that audiences are capable of rationally assessing the truth, quality, and credibility of core speech. The second is that more speech is generally preferable to less. These assumptions, which I refer to collectively as the rational audience model, lie at the heart of the "marketplace of ideas" metaphor, which has long been a target of criticism amongst First Amendment scholars. Now, however, cognitive psychology and behavioral economics provide empirical evidence that the assumptions of the rational audience model are demonstrably false in some commonplace settings. This Article nonetheless contends that behavioral economics has not yet made the case for jettisoning the rational audience model in the realm of core speech. As the Supreme Court has recognized, a legal test that looks at the "actual effects" of speech would be cumbersome and expensive to apply, and would therefore chill speech. But there are even more compelling reasons to adhere to a test focused on the "reasonable interpretation" of core speech. Because speech and expression are closely linked to individual autonomy, government constriction of core speech-particularly political speech-undermines the foundation of a self-governing democracy. Moreover, the rational audience model prevents public discourse from being reduced to the level of the least educated or least sophisticated audience member. The model calls on citizens to raise their cognitive capacities to meet the demands of public discourse, and it serves as a check on the government's increasingly powerful ability to drown out other speakers in that discourse. This Article concludes that the rational audience model represents a flawed but worthy ideal.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 52

Keywords: First Amendment, core speech, rational audience model, marketplace of ideas

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: March 21, 2009 ; Last revised: March 16, 2010

Suggested Citation

Lidsky, Lyrissa Barnett, Nobody's Fools: The Rational Audience as First Amendment Ideal (March 20, 2009). University of Illinois Law Review, Forthcoming . Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1365979 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1365979

Contact Information

Lyrissa Barnett Lidsky (Contact Author)
University of Florida - Levin College of Law ( email )
P.O. Box 117625
Gainesville, FL 32611-7625
United States
352.392.2211 (Phone)
352.392.3005 (Fax)

Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,163
Downloads: 150
Download Rank: 155,374
Citations:  2
Footnotes:  317