The Role of Consumption and Listed Alternative Investments on the Lifetime-Ruin Probability of U.S. Households

57 Pages Posted: 24 Mar 2009

See all articles by Juliane Proelss

Juliane Proelss

Concordia University, Quebec; Trier University of Applied Sciences

Denis Schweizer

Concordia University

Date Written: March 22, 2009

Abstract

In light of the current subprime and financial crises, retirement planning has gained in importance. Many U.S. households have had to reevaluate their assets and their retirement plans (if they even had plans). Most U.S. households, however, find it difficult to assess their retirements and the attendant risks properly. Households that have noticed a need for action often fail to fully evaluate the effectiveness of any potential actions.

In this article we propose to solve the problem for different U.S. households: middle class, upper-middle class and upper class by estimating the risk to be alive when the financial portfolio falls short (life-time ruin probability). We further consider a reduction in consumption as well as portfolio diversification in listed alternative investments and its effect on the reduction of life-time ruin risk. The complex model we employ accounts for the stochastic total wealth accumulation including income, consumption, housing, debt, and saving dynamics (after inflation, tax, and transaction costs).

We find that the life-time ruin probability for all considered households is unacceptably high: For the middle class even 75%, and still 54% for the upper class. But, the risk of portfolio ruin can be substantially reduced if the household is willing to decrease living expenses by 30% and diversifies in a na┬┐ve diversified portfolio of listed alternative investments by 30%, even if we account for the financial crisis. Finally we find that the middle class households must reassess their living expenses in the short run since it can only reduce lifetime ruin risk to 25% even if it takes all suggested action. In comparison the middle class and upper-middle class can reduce its lifetime-ruin risk to a reasonable 14% and 12.6%, which can be further decreased with a professional financial planning of the liquid (financial) assets.

Keywords: Alternative investments, financial planning, lifetime-ruin probability, retirement

JEL Classification: G01, G11, G17

Suggested Citation

Proelss, Juliane and Schweizer, Denis, The Role of Consumption and Listed Alternative Investments on the Lifetime-Ruin Probability of U.S. Households (March 22, 2009). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1366773 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1366773

Juliane Proelss

Concordia University, Quebec ( email )

1455 de Maisonneuve Blvd. W.
Montreal, Quebec H3G 1MB
Canada

Trier University of Applied Sciences ( email )

Scheidershof
Trier, 54293
Germany

Denis Schweizer (Contact Author)

Concordia University ( email )

1455 de Maisonneuve Blvd. W.
Montreal, Quebec H3G 1M8
Canada
+1 (514) 848-2424 ext. 2926 (Phone)
+1 (514) 848-4500 (Fax)

HOME PAGE: http://www.concordia.ca/jmsb/faculty/denis-schweizer.html

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
70
Abstract Views
649
rank
325,129
PlumX Metrics