References (26)



The Health Impact of Mandatory Bicycle Helmet Laws

Piet De Jong

Macquarie University - Department of Applied Finance and Actuarial Studies; Financial Research Network (FIRN)

February 24, 2010

Risk Analysis, 2012

This article seeks to answer the question whether mandatory bicycle helmet laws deliver a net societal health benefit. The question is addressed using a simple model. The model recognizes a single health benefit -- reduced head injuries, and a single health cost -- increased morbidity due to foregone exercise from reduced cycling. Using estimates suggested in the literature of the effectiveness of helmets, the health benefits of cycling, head injury rates, and reductions in cycling, leads to the following conclusions. In jurisdictions where cycling is safe, a helmet law is likely to have a large unintended negative health impact. In jurisdiction where cycling is relatively unsafe, helmets will do little to make it safer and a helmet law, under relatively extreme assumptions may make a small positive contribution to net societal health. The model serves to focus the mandatory bicycle helmet law debate on overall health.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 10

Keywords: Bicycling, helmets, cost benefit analysis

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: July 14, 2009 ; Last revised: January 10, 2012

Suggested Citation

De Jong, Piet, The Health Impact of Mandatory Bicycle Helmet Laws (February 24, 2010). Risk Analysis, 2012. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1368064 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1368064

Contact Information

Piet De Jong (Contact Author)
Macquarie University - Department of Applied Finance and Actuarial Studies ( email )
Sydney, New South Wales
Financial Research Network (FIRN)
C/- University of Queensland Business School
St Lucia, 4071 Brisbane
HOME PAGE: http://www.firn.org.au

Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 19,851
Downloads: 2,584
Download Rank: 3,343
References:  26