Footnotes (14)



Directing Military Operations

Michael D. Ramsey

University of San Diego School of Law

March 5, 2009

Texas Law Review, Vol. 87, p. 29, 2009

This Comment to Professor Saikrishna Prakash's article The Separation and Overlap of War and Military Powers, disagrees with Prakash's contention that the Constitution does not grant the President any exclusive military powers. In particular, it takes issue with Prakash's view that Congress's constitutional power "to make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces" gives Congress all-encompassing military power. It finds that although the Constitution grants Congress the authority to pass standing laws regulating general military conduct, the Constitution does not grant Congress the power to direct battlefield operations. Comparing the Constitution's language to that of its predecessor, the Articles of Confederation, it argues that the President alone has the power to direct military operations, and congressional attempts to exercise such authority would be unconstitutional.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 8

Keywords: commander in chief, presidential power, executive power, military command, president

JEL Classification: K39, K33

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: April 2, 2009  

Suggested Citation

Ramsey, Michael D., Directing Military Operations (March 5, 2009). Texas Law Review, Vol. 87, p. 29, 2009. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1371687

Contact Information

Michael D. Ramsey (Contact Author)
University of San Diego School of Law ( email )
5998 Alcala Park
San Diego, CA 92110-2492
United States
619-260-4145 (Phone)
619-260-2218 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 767
Downloads: 76
Download Rank: 240,647
Footnotes:  14