The House of Lords in Al-Jedda and Public International Law: Attribution of Conduct to UN-Authorized Forces and the Power of the Security Council to Displace Human Rights

Netherlands International Law Review, Vol. LVI, pp. 35-62, 2009

28 Pages Posted: 8 Apr 2009 Last revised: 1 Jun 2009

See all articles by Francesco Messineo

Francesco Messineo

United Nations Office of Legal Affairs

Date Written: January 16, 2009

Abstract

This article deals with the recent Al-Jedda House of Lords judgment from the point of view of public international law. Mr Al-Jedda unsuccessfully sought a remedy under the Human Rights Act against his prolonged internment without charge or trial in a British prison in Iraq. The article provides an in depth analysis of the opinions delivered by their Lordships. It advances some criticism of the line of reasoning adopted. Despite reaching the right result, the distinguishing arguments employed by the House to eschew the controversial Behrami case by the European Court of Human Rights seem unconvincing. Secondly, the decision that Article 5 ECHR was 'qualified and/or displaced' was an inherently ambiguous one. It left too many questions open as to the law applicable to Mr Al-Jedda's internment, some of which this article seeks to clarify.

Keywords: Al-Jedda, internment, armed conflict, attribution, responsibility, Behrami, Security Council, human rights, humanitarian law

Suggested Citation

Messineo, Francesco, The House of Lords in Al-Jedda and Public International Law: Attribution of Conduct to UN-Authorized Forces and the Power of the Security Council to Displace Human Rights (January 16, 2009). Netherlands International Law Review, Vol. LVI, pp. 35-62, 2009, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1373789

Francesco Messineo (Contact Author)

United Nations Office of Legal Affairs ( email )

United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
605
Abstract Views
2,621
Rank
87,152
PlumX Metrics