Agency Costs and Business Cycles

Posted: 24 Feb 1999

See all articles by Charles T. Carlstrom

Charles T. Carlstrom

Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland

Timothy S. Fuerst

University of Notre Dame

Abstract

This paper develops a model with endogenous agency costs that is otherwise quite similar to the canonical real business cycle model. The traditional assumption in the literature is that these agency costs arise in the production of investment goods. In contrast, this paper assumes that these costs are all encompassing in the sense that they arise in the production of aggregate output. The paper explores both the importance of the investment vs. output assumption for business cycle dynamics, and the conditions under which these agency models can deliver amplification and/or persistence. The paper has two principal conclusions. First, in terms of amplification and propagation, the output model performs worse than does the investment model. This arises because a variable distortion in the investment market has more of an impact than a comparable distortion in the output market. Second, in this model with optimal consumption choice by entrepreneurs, there is a clear tension between amplification and persistence.

JEL Classification: E32, E44

Suggested Citation

Carlstrom, Charles T. and Fuerst, Timothy S., Agency Costs and Business Cycles. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=137416

Charles T. Carlstrom (Contact Author)

Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland ( email )

PO Box 6387
Cleveland, OH 44101-1387
United States
216-579-2294 (Phone)
216-579-3050 (Fax)

Timothy S. Fuerst

University of Notre Dame ( email )

Notre Dame, IN 46556
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
890
PlumX Metrics