Project Selection and Equivalent Capm-Based Investment Criteria
Applied Financial Economics Letters, Vol. 32, pp. 165-168, 2007
7 Pages Posted: 8 Apr 2009
Date Written: 2007
Abstract
This paper shows that the CAPM-based capital budgeting criteria proposed by Tuttle and Litzenberger (1968), Mossin (1969), Hamada (1969), Stapleton (1971), Rubinstein (1973), Bierman and Hass (1973), Bogue and Roll (1974) are equivalent: They all state that a project is profitable if its internal rate of return is greater than the risk-adjusted cost of capital, where the latter is given by the sum of the risk-free rate and a risk-premium which is a function of the systematic risk of the project, itself a function of the project cost.
Keywords: Capital budgeting, investment decisions, capital asset pricing model, equivalence.
JEL Classification: G11, G12, G30, G31
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Project Valuation and Investment Decisions: CAPM Versus Arbitrage
-
Correct or Incorrect Application of CAPM? Correct or Incorrect Decisions With CAPM?