Fiscal Home Rule

31 Pages Posted: 8 Apr 2009 Last revised: 14 May 2009

Date Written: April 8, 2009


Local governments often enjoy "home rule," in the sense that they are able to initiate legislation concerning municipal affairs without obtaining the prior consent of the state legislature. At the same time, these localities often are able to exercise limited discretion over revenue raising. In theory, at least, the inability to raise funds constrains the exercise of substantive home rule authority. Moreover, the specific restrictions that states often impose on municipalities instantiates a particular, non-redistributive view of local government and, by restricting the set of fiscal tools that are available to the locality, arguably causes deviations from an ideal market for residence. This Article discusses the constraints that localities often face with respect to imposing taxes on residents and issuing debt to pay for capital projects. While there are plausible explanations for these limitations, restrictions on fiscal home rule must ultimately be weighed against the distortions that they cause when localities seek to circumvent them. Reliance on market mechanisms to select a locality's taxing and debt structure may produce superior results.

Keywords: home rule, local government, interlocal competition, Tiebout

JEL Classification: H21, H71, R51, K00

Suggested Citation

Gillette, Clayton P., Fiscal Home Rule (April 8, 2009). NYU School of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 09-23, NYU Law and Economics Research Paper No. 09-17, Available at SSRN: or

Clayton P. Gillette (Contact Author)

New York University School of Law ( email )

40 Washington Square South
New York, NY 10012-1099
United States
212-998-6749 (Phone)
212-995-4692 (Fax)

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics