Chicago, Post-Chicago, and Neo-Chicago

Crane, Daniel A.

Download this Paper Open PDF in Browser

Chicago, Post-Chicago, and Neo-Chicago

University of Chicago Law Review, Vol. 76, 2009

Cardozo Legal Studies Research Paper No. 259

26 Pages Posted: 9 Apr 2009

Daniel A. Crane

University of Michigan Law School

Date Written: April 8, 2009

Abstract

This essay reviews Bob Pitofsky's 2008 essay compilation, How Chicago Overshot the Mark: The Effect of Conservative Economic Analysis on U.S. Antitrust. The essay critically evaluates the book's rough handling of the Chicago School and suggests a path forward for a Neo-Chicago approach to antitrust analysis.

Keywords: antitrust, antitrust theory, empiricism, free markets, free riders, merger policy

Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation

Crane, Daniel A., Chicago, Post-Chicago, and Neo-Chicago (April 8, 2009). University of Chicago Law Review, Vol. 76, 2009; Cardozo Legal Studies Research Paper No. 259. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1375026

Daniel A. Crane (Contact Author)

University of Michigan Law School ( email )

625 South State Street
Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1215
United States
734-615-2622 (Phone)

Download this Paper Open PDF in Browser

Paper statistics

Downloads

817

Rank

22,915

Abstract Views

5,199

4 Citations

Chicago, Post-Chicago, and Neo-Chicago

Daniel A. Crane

Abstract

Daniel A. Crane (Contact Author)

University of Michigan Law School ( email )

Paper statistics

Recommended Papers

Quick Links

Rankings

About

Chicago, Post-Chicago, and Neo-Chicago

Daniel A. Crane

Abstract

Daniel A. Crane (Contact Author)

University of Michigan Law School ( email )

Paper statistics

Related eJournals

Cardozo Law School Legal Studies Research Paper Series

IO: Regulation, Antitrust & Privatization eJournal

Antitrust: Antitrust Law & Policy eJournal

Law & Economics eJournal

Recommended Papers

Quick Links

Rankings

About