The Ethics of Distribution in a Warming Planet
48 Pages Posted: 9 Apr 2009
Date Written: April 9, 2009
Abstract
The discounted-utilitarian social welfare function (DU) is used by the great majority of researchers studying intergenerational resource allocation in the presence of climate change (e.g., W. Nordhaus, M. Weitzman, N. Stern, and P. Dasgupta). I present three justifications for using DU: (1) the view that the first generation's preferences should be hegemonic, (2) the viewpoint of a utilitarian Ethical Observer who maximizes expected utility when the existence of future generations is uncertain, and (3) axiomatic justifications (as in classical social-choice theory). I argue that only justification (2) provides an ethically convincing justification, and that, only if one endorses utilitarianism as a good ethic. Recent work by Llavador, Roemer and Silvestre challenges the utilitarian assumption, and argues that sustaining human welfare at the highest possible level forever, or sustaining the growth rate of human welfare (at a fixed exogenous growth rate), are more attractive ethical choices. The work of these authors, which studies the optimal intergenerational paths of resource allocation under the sustainabilitarian objectives, is briefly reviewed and contrasted with the discounted-utilitarian approach.
Keywords: Climate change, Intergenerational justice, Sustainability, Utilitarianism
JEL Classification: D70, D90, D63
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
A Dynamic Analysis of Human Welfare in a Warming Planet
By Humberto Llavador, John E. Roemer, ...
-
Intergenerational Justice and Sustainability Under the Leximin Ethic
-
What We Owe Our Children, They Their Children, and...
By John E. Roemer and Roberto Veneziani
-
By Joel Sobel and Uzi Segal
-
A Complete and Strongly Anonymous Leximin Relation on Infinite Streams
By Geir B. Asheim and Stephane Zuber
-
Intergenerational Justice in Aging Societies: A Cross-National Comparison of 29 OECD Countries
-
Liberal Egalitarianism and the Harm Principle
By Michele Lombardi, Kaname Miyagishima, ...
-
Liberal Principles for Social Welfare Relations in Infinitely-Lived Societies