Footnotes (24)



Law and Language: How Words Mislead Us

Brian Bix

University of Minnesota Law School

Minnesota Legal Studies Research Paper No. 09-22

This talk was the Reappointment Lecture for the Frederick W. Thomas Chair in the Interdisciplinary Study of Law and Language at the University of Minnesota. The topic is the way that the words we use in legal doctrinal reasoning can - intentionally and unintentionally - mislead us regarding the proper outcomes of cases and the best development of the law. Connecting to the ideas of the American legal realists Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., and Felix Cohen, the talk uses examples from Contract Law (assent to terms in electronic contracting cases, waiver of the failure of conditions), Medical Decision-Making (deciding on behalf of incompetent patients), and Family Law (same-sex marriage, child custody, and alimony) to make general points about how we choose words to make our decisions more persuasive or more comfortable, when we should instead be using more transparent (more honest) terminology, in order better to confront the real underlying moral and policy questions.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 22

Keywords: contract law, family law, assent, substituted judgment, same-sex marriage, alimony, American legal realism, Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr., Felix Cohen

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: April 13, 2009 ; Last revised: June 26, 2009

Suggested Citation

Bix, Brian, Law and Language: How Words Mislead Us. Minnesota Legal Studies Research Paper No. 09-22. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1376366 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1376366

Contact Information

Brian Bix (Contact Author)
University of Minnesota Law School ( email )
229 19th Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN 55455
United States
612-624-2505 (Phone)
612-625-2011 (Fax)

Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 4,510
Downloads: 883
Download Rank: 19,556
Footnotes:  24