Sequential versus Simultaneous Contributions to Public Goods: Experimental Evidence
39 Pages Posted: 14 Apr 2009
Date Written: April 2009
Abstract
We report an experiment comparing sequential and simultaneous contributions to a public good in a quasi-linear two-person setting (Varian, Journal of Public Economics, 1994). Our findings support the theoretical argument that sequential contributions result in lower overall provision than simultaneous contributions. However, the distribution of contributions is not as predicted: late contributors are sometimes willing to punish early low contributors by contributing less than their best response. This induces early contributors to contribute more than they otherwise would. A consequence of this is that we fail to observe a predicted first mover advantage.
Keywords: public goods, voluntary contributions, sequential moves, experiment
JEL Classification: C92, D03, H41
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
After You - Endogenous Sequencing in Voluntary Contribution Games
-
Endogenous Leadership: Selection and Influence
By Emrah Arbak and Marie Claire Villeval
-
Endogenous Leadership Selection and Influence
By Emrah Arbak and Marie Claire Villeval
-
Who Makes a Good Leader? Social Preferences and Leading-by-Example
By Simon Gaechter, Daniele Nosenzo, ...
-
Leading With(Out) Sacrifice? A Public-Goods Experiment with a Super-Additive Player
By Andreas Glöckner, Bernd Irlenbusch, ...
-
Leadership by Example and by Pre-Game Communication in Social Dilemma Situations
By Ganna Pogrebna, David Krantz, ...