Why the NPV Criterion Does Not Maximize NPV

32 Pages Posted: 24 Nov 1998

See all articles by Elazar Berkovitch

Elazar Berkovitch

Interdisciplinary Center, Herzliyah

Ronen Israel

Interdisciplinary Center, Herzliyah

Date Written: November 2, 1998

Abstract

In this article, we show plausible situations where the Net Present Value (NPV) criterion leads to inefficient capital budgeting outcomes and is dominated by other capital budgeting criteria, like the internal rate of return (IRR) and the profitability index (PI). Our theory is rooted in the mainstream paradigm of corporate finance: Firms use NPV to measure the addition to firm value from prospective projects, but because of "classical" informational and agency considerations, NPV is not the capital budgeting criterion that implements the best possible outcome. We show that the IRR and PI are useful in curbing empire-building managers because, when selecting between mutually exclusive projects, they tend to bias against large-scale projects. Interestingly, they implement a better outcome in exactly the situations where they conflict with the NPV criterion.

JEL Classification: G31

Suggested Citation

Berkovitch, Elazar and Israel, Ronen, Why the NPV Criterion Does Not Maximize NPV (November 2, 1998). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=138643 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.138643

Elazar Berkovitch

Interdisciplinary Center, Herzliyah ( email )

P.O. Box 167
Herzliya, 46150
Israel

Ronen Israel (Contact Author)

Interdisciplinary Center, Herzliyah ( email )

P.O. Box 167
Herzliya, 4610101
Israel
972-9-9527306 (Phone)

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
3,191
Abstract Views
10,621
Rank
7,867
PlumX Metrics