The Google Book Search Settlement: Ends, Means, and the Future of Books

17 Pages Posted: 17 Apr 2009

Date Written: April 17, 2009

Abstract

For the past four years, Google has been systematically making digital copies of books in the collections of many major university libraries. It made the digital copies searchable through its web site - you couldn't read the books, but you could at least find out where the phrase you're looking for appears within them. This outraged copyright owners, who filed a class action lawsuit to make Google stop. Then, last fall, the parties to this large class action announced an even larger settlement: one that would give Google a license not only to scan books, but also to sell them.

The settlement tackles the orphan works problem, but through the judicial process. Laundering orphan works legislation through a class action lawsuit is both a brilliant response to legislative inaction and a dangerous use of the judicial power. Many of the public interest safeguards that would have been present in the political arena are attenuated in a seemingly private lawsuit; the lack of such safeguards is evident in the terms of the resulting settlement. The solution is to reinsert these missing public interest protections into the settlement.

Keywords: Google, Google Book Search, copyright

JEL Classification: K00

Suggested Citation

Grimmelmann, James and Grimmelmann, James, The Google Book Search Settlement: Ends, Means, and the Future of Books (April 17, 2009). ACS Issue Brief, NYLS Legal Studies Research Paper No. 08/09 #32, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1388846 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1388846

James Grimmelmann (Contact Author)

Cornell Tech ( email )

2 West Loop Road
New York, NY 10044
United States

Cornell Law School ( email )

Myron Taylor Hall
Cornell University
Ithaca, NY 14853-4901
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
419
Abstract Views
3,212
Rank
121,392
PlumX Metrics