Footnotes (32)



Why Religious Liberty is a Special, Important and Limited Right

John Finnis

University of Oxford - Faculty of Law; Notre Dame Law School

October 30, 2008

Notre Dame Legal Studies Paper No. 09-11

This address to a conference in Princeton on religious liberty in the contemporary situation engages in a critical review of the main thesis of Christopher Eisgruber and Lawrence Sager, Religious Freedom & the Constitution (Harvard UP, 2007), that religion is not “a … category of human experience that demands special benefits and/or necessitates special restrictions,” or any “special immunity for religiously motivated conduct.” Against this position it is argued that natural religion of the form manifested in the New York Regents’ prayer outlawed by the US Supreme Court in Engel v Vitale (1962) is not to be put on the same constitutional level as (or below) other human passionate interests or even conscience. The paper considers inter alia the Indian and the European Convention provisions on religious liberty.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 19

Keywords: religious liberty, free exercise, liberty, religion, freedom of religion

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: April 22, 2009  

Suggested Citation

Finnis, John, Why Religious Liberty is a Special, Important and Limited Right (October 30, 2008). Notre Dame Legal Studies Paper No. 09-11. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1392278 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1392278

Contact Information

John M. Finnis (Contact Author)
University of Oxford - Faculty of Law ( email )
University College
High Street
Oxford, England OX1 4BH
United Kingdom
Notre Dame Law School ( email )
P.O. Box 780
Notre Dame, IN 46556-0780
United States

Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,898
Downloads: 567
Download Rank: 36,328
Footnotes:  32