Why Religious Liberty is a Special, Important and Limited Right

19 Pages Posted: 22 Apr 2009

Date Written: October 30, 2008

Abstract

This address to a conference in Princeton on religious liberty in the contemporary situation engages in a critical review of the main thesis of Christopher Eisgruber and Lawrence Sager, Religious Freedom & the Constitution (Harvard UP, 2007), that religion is not “a … category of human experience that demands special benefits and/or necessitates special restrictions,” or any “special immunity for religiously motivated conduct.” Against this position it is argued that natural religion of the form manifested in the New York Regents’ prayer outlawed by the US Supreme Court in Engel v Vitale (1962) is not to be put on the same constitutional level as (or below) other human passionate interests or even conscience. The paper considers inter alia the Indian and the European Convention provisions on religious liberty.

Keywords: religious liberty, free exercise, liberty, religion, freedom of religion

Suggested Citation

Finnis, John M., Why Religious Liberty is a Special, Important and Limited Right (October 30, 2008). Notre Dame Legal Studies Paper No. 09-11, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1392278 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1392278

John M. Finnis (Contact Author)

University of Oxford ( email )

University College
Oxford, OX1 4BH
United Kingdom

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
844
Abstract Views
3,295
Rank
53,229
PlumX Metrics