Has Corporate Law Failed? Addressing Proposals for Reform

20 Pages Posted: 14 Jul 2009

See all articles by Antony Page

Antony Page

Florida International University (FIU) - College of Law

Date Written: April 21, 2009


Successful corporations create extraordinary wealth. The longstanding question is how this wealth should be distributed. The conventional answer has been shareholder primacy. Most stakeholders, such as customers, suppliers, creditors, and employees, must negotiate their portion ex ante, but everything left over, the residual interest, belongs to the corporation’s shareholders. The progressive answer is that wealth should be distributed fairly to all stakeholders, and that corporations have a social responsibility that goes beyond the mere maximization of shareholder wealth. This essay reviews Kent Greenfield's book, The Failure of Corporate Law: Fundamental Flaws and Progressive Possibilities, that develops and extends the arguments for a broader stakeholder approach.

Keywords: corporate governance, progressive corporate law, corporate social responsibility

JEL Classification: K22

Suggested Citation

Page, Antony, Has Corporate Law Failed? Addressing Proposals for Reform (April 21, 2009). Michigan Law Review, Vol. 107, 2009, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1392628

Antony Page (Contact Author)

Florida International University (FIU) - College of Law ( email )

11200 SW 8th St.
RDB Hall 1097
Miami, FL 33199
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics